Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Consumer Watchdog Calls On FTC

  1. Default

    In a letter to the five FTC commissioners, the nonpartisan, nonprofit public interest group warned that a “negotiated settlement will inevitably invite cynicism about the results, particularly if such an accord allowed Google to deny any wrongdoing."
    FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz has reportedly told Google to answer the agency’s antitrust concerns in the next few weeks or face legal action. A suit or settlement would require approval by a majority of the Commissioners.

  2. Default Consumer Watchdog Calls On FTC

    "The Federal Trade Commission’s role in keeping Google’s abuses in check is essential. The Internet is too important to allow an unregulated monopolist to dominate it,” wrote John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog’s Privacy Project director. “We call on you to take the steps necessary to prevent it: File a formal antitrust complaint against Google and go to trial in Federal District Court in Washington, DC. If the Commission opts to settle the case, the consent agreement must require Google to admit wrongdoing and be strong enough to change Google’s behavior and protect consumers from harm."

  3. Default

  4. Default

    Consumer Watchdog stressed that a public trial is the best course to follow, but if the FTC opts to negotiate, here are some specific recommendations for a meaningful settlement:

    • Google should be required to divest Motorola Mobility, whose standards essential patents it is using unfairly by not making them available for license on a fair basis.
    • Google should be broken into different companies devoted to different lines of business so there is no incentive to unfairly use search to promote other services.
    • Google’s search services should be separated from services where Google provides its own content.
    • Google’s search engine’s importance as a gateway to Internet requires a maximum degree of openness and transparency. Google’s monopoly position and importance to the Internet means that the company should be closely regulated like a public utility.
    • Google should be forced to disgorge its monopolistic gains through the imposition of substantial financial penalties.

  5. Default

    There’s an argument that Google should be forced to honor Moto’s original FRAND commitments, but I don’t see how selling Moto accomplished that. Moto was breaching their FRAND obligations before Google’ bought them, what makes anybody think that they wouldn’t continue to do so if Google sold them again?
    The other suggested remedies are perhaps even less sensible – a load of Naderite nonesense

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts